The
documents are about the adverse reactions recorded among individuals who
received Pfizer vaccines between December 2020 and February 2021 with a list of
over 1000 diseases to look out for among the people who took Pfizer vaccines.
The
150 documents with more than 10,000 pages are the only documents so far
available for the public concerning the impact of the Covid vaccines on the
lives of people and were produced on an order of the courts of law.
Background
The Public
Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), in the United States
submitted a Freedom of Information request to the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) on 27th August 2021 requesting all of the data within
Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine biological product file.
The non-profit
organisation of nearly 600 public health professionals, medical professionals,
scientists, and journalists argued that “there [was] a clear urgency to inform
the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity” of
vaccination.
On 9th September
2021, the FDA denied the PHMPT the information on grounds that the requester had
“not demonstrated an urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged
Federal Government activity”
The PHMPT sued
FDA at the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, pleading for an “order
directing the FDA to produce all documents responsive to their request in no
event later than 10 days from the date of any such order”
On 6th January 2022 Justice Mark T. Pittman, ordered the FDA to: produce more than 10,000
pages by 1st March 2022, 150,000 pages before August 2022 and 55,000 pages each
month thereafter.
The 150 documents
are downloadable at PHMPT website including the post-marketing document of
about 40 pages about adverse events of Pfizer vaccines in the USA, Canada, UK,
Italy, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and other 53 other countries for a
period of 3 months (Dec 2020-Feb 2021).
 |
| Downloadable documents at The Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) website. Screenshot/ Faith Reporters |
Inside the documents
The data shows that over 42000 people
experienced adverse events of special interest including over 1200 deaths,
especially in the USA.
Dr Mobeen Syed the CEO at DrBeen Corp, an online medical school based in California, criticised the report in the first place for being short of crucial numbers.
“They don’t tell how many doses they
supplied. Numbers would help us know the extent of adverse events” Dr Mobeen
said in an analysis posted to his YouTube channel last week.
Pfizer and FDA had projected that the
vaccine would cause myocardia among people aged 12-15 at a rate of 0.53 per
million doses but the study by FDA revealed that it caused 70.73 cases per
million dozes among young people aged 12-15.
“This is too
high. It’s an increase of 133times but Pfizer insists that no new adverse event
found since the administration of their vaccines” Dr Syed commented.
The document
also records 1403 cardiovascular diseases of which 1076 were found among females
and no study establishes why females are more prone to cardiovascular diseases from
Pfizer vaccines than men.
Dr John Campbell
who has taught nursing and practiced medicine for the last 40 years in London also
criticised FDA and Pfizer for presenting doctored statistics which do not reveal
the base number of administered doses for the public to ascertain the extent of
adverse events.
“We
could work out the percentage of people getting adverse reactions and the
percentage of people dying due to vaccination but we can’t because we don’t
know how many vaccines were given out,” he said.
“Why would they
want to deduct that information” Dr Campbell wondered.
However, Dr Dale
Bratzler of the University of Oklahoma told Oklahoma News this week that the
adverse events recorded in the Pfizer documents are not necessarily about the
impact of the vaccines on people’s lives.
“When you look at this particular
surveillance report, a few people who died had Covid when they were vaccinated.
They died of Covid” he said.
Moreover, he argued that the report is
about people who voluntarily reported something which does not necessarily mean
that they were the people who actually got the vaccines.
“It has nothing to do with the actual incidents of side effects of the events that happen because somebody took the vaccine” he argued.
References:
Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency website
..........................................
If you have an opinion about this article, please share your opinion with us and we will publish it.
.......................................
Faith Reporters
Email: faithreporters@gmail.com
Tel: +250788240436
May God bless you
Comments
Post a Comment