A
9-year-old boy is being denied a life-saving kidney transplant because his
father is not vaccinated against COVID-19.
By The Epoch Times
Dane
Donaldson was found to be a perfect match for his son Tanner back in early 2018
by the Cleveland Clinic Children’s Hospital before the outbreak of the pandemic.
The family
decided to wait a little longer before having Tanner undergo the transplant
since transplanted kidneys from a live donor only lasted about 20 years.
Cleveland-Clinic-Children-Hospital-refuses-father-to-son-kidney-transplant-Covid-unvaccinated-dad
Now the hospital
is refusing to perform the life-saving father-to-son kidney transplant it
agreed to do nearly four years ago over the senior Donaldson’s unvaccinated
status.
In a statement
released to The Epoch Times, the Cleveland Clinic cited a 2021 policy it
adopted requiring all donors and candidates for organ transplants to be fully
vaccinated against the virus.
“Individuals who
are actively infected with COVID-19 have a much higher rate of complications
during and after surgery, even if the infection is asymptomatic,” the hospital
stated.
Donaldson, who
is in the insurance business, told The Epoch Times he is opposed to the
COVID-19 vaccine for religious reasons, but also because he has seen a rising
number of clients get critically ill after receiving it.
He believes the
hospital is contradicting itself by requiring a living donor to be vaccinated,
but not a deceased one.
“I asked them in
that car accident victim, would you vaccinate him on the way to the hospital to
rip his kidney out and they said ‘no’,” Donaldson told The Epoch Times.
Donaldson said
he even offered to sign a waiver freeing the hospital from any liability should
either himself or his son develop COVID-19. At the same time, the hospital has
refused to agree to take any responsibility for any side effects that he or his
son experienced from the vaccine.
The hospital, he
said, is blowing the chance of a lifetime for his son.
“A live donor is
the best donor for kidneys,” said Donaldson, “but they’ll take a kidney from a
deceased person not vaccinated, it makes no sense.”
The Cleveland
hospital agreed that live donors are the best source for kidney transplant
recipients, but emphasized that they were “not without risks”—noting that there
is medication kidney transplant patients must take that compromises the immune
system.
“We continually
strive to minimize risk to our living donors, and vaccination is an important
component to ensure the safest approach and optimal outcomes for donors,” it
stated.
Donaldson said
he and his wife Jenn are now in the process of finding another hospital to
perform the transplant. They had wanted to stay with the children’s hospital
because it has been treating his son since birth.
Tanner was born
with compromised kidneys due to a rare birth defect that caused irreversible
kidney damage in utero and resulted in stage 4 chronic kidney disease as well
as bladder and urinary dysfunctions.
He now has only
18 percent function left of his kidneys, according to Donaldson.
The Donaldsons
join a number of other publicized cases of U.S. hospitals that have refused to
perform organ transplants because either the donor or recipient was not
vaccinated.
Last month, The
Epoch Times covered the story of an Air Force veteran who was denied a kidney
transplant because he was refusing the vaccine.
Chad Carswell
had only 4 percent kidney function left when the Atrium Health Wake Forest
Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, refused to keep him on
their candidate list for a donated kidney.
Fortunately,
after his story went public the Medical City Fort Worth Transplant Institute in
Texas offered to put Carswell on their recipient list for a kidney. His
attorney Adam Draper said that as of April 3, Carswell was still in need of a
match for the transplant.
In January, attorneys
for the conservative organization Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) wrote
a seven-page letter to the Cleveland Center requesting it reconsider the
decision, and also the science behind it.
“Presently, it
appears the hospital is operating under a psychosis of flawed morality in
choosing to sacrifice the health and wellness of its 9-year-old patient in
exchange for what it perceives to be the ‘greater good,'” ICAN’s lawyers Aaron
Siri and Elizabeth Brehm wrote.
ICAN also called
the hospital irrational because the entire family, including Tanner and his
older brother, all had COVID-19 and recovered from it, meaning they have
natural immunity.
In its letter to
the hospital, ICAN cited a number of international studies that showed that
re-infection of COVID-19 after recovering from the virus was rare.
Of the studies
it cited was one performed by Cleveland Clinic itself.
In the study,
the hospital looked at SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infections
in 52,238 vaccinated and unvaccinated health care workers over a five-month
period.
It found that none of the previously infected healthcare workers who remained unvaccinated contracted SARS-CoV-2 over the course of the research despite a high background rate of COVID-19 in the hospital.
Comments
Post a Comment